Menu

Filter by
content
PONT Data&Privacy

0

Article 29 (applicability of Awb)

  • 1

    A decision on a request referred to in Article 25 or 28 shall constitute a decision within the meaning of the General Administrative Law Act.

  • 2

    The interested party may, within the time limit determined for the appeal under the General Administrative Law Act, turn to the Autoriteit persoonsgegevens Authority with a request to mediate or advise in its dispute with the controller. In that case, notwithstanding Article 6:7 of the General Administrative Law Act, the appeal may still be lodged after the interested party has received notification from the Autoriteit persoonsgegevens that the handling of the case has ended, but not later than six weeks after that time.

  • 3

    In complaint proceedings in which the controller or persons working under its responsibility are required pursuant to Section 9:31 of the General Administrative Law Act to provide information or submit documents to the National Ombudsman with respect to police data traceable to an informant as referred to in Section 12(7), Our Minister of Security and Justice may decide that Section 9:31(5) and (6) of that Act shall not apply.

  • 4

    If Our Minister of Security and Justice has decided that Article 9:31, fifth and sixth paragraphs, of the General Administrative Law Act shall not apply and the controller or persons working under its responsibility shall be required to produce documents, it shall suffice to make the documents concerned available for inspection. No copies of the documents in question shall be made in any way whatsoever.

  • 5

    In proceedings regarding decisions as referred to in the first paragraph in which the controller or persons working under its responsibility are obliged pursuant to Sections 8:27, 8:28 or 8:45 of the General Administrative Law Act to provide information or submit documents relating to police data that can be traced back to an informant as referred to in Section 12(7), Our Minister of Security and Justice may decide that Section 8:29(3) to (5) of that Act shall not apply. If documents are to be submitted to the court, the submission of the documents in question shall then suffice. No copies of the documents in question shall be made. If Our Minister of Security and Justice informs the court that only the court may take cognizance of the information or documents, the court may only rule on the basis of such information or documents with the consent of the other parties.

Information valid on 01-01-2020

Regulations based on this article (delegated regulations)

No

Policies and circulars that have this article as legal authority

No

Articles or similar text referring to this article

  1. Policy rule CBP guidelines ANPR
    text: text

  2. Policy rules on camera surveillance, Personal Data Protection Board
    text

  3. Law on use of passenger data to combat terrorist and serious crimes
    Article: 17

  4. Police Data Act
    article: 36f, 36c

  5. BES Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act
    article: 3.3

  6. Money Laundering and Terrorist Financing Prevention Act
    section: 14

Summary of changes for this article

(01-01-2020)

Origination source

Entry into force

Effective date

Retroactivity

Subject

Signature

Announcement

Chamber documents

Signature

Announcement

Note

2019

modification

2018

Stb. 2018, 401

34889

2018

Stb. 2018, 495

2013

modification

2012

Stb. 2012, 316

32822

2012

Stb. 2012, 317

modification

2012

Stb. 2012, 682

32450

2012

Stb. 2012, 684

Alg. 1

2008

new-arrangement

2007

Stb. 2007, 300

30327

2007

Stb. 2007, 549

Comments

  • 1) Part C, Article I, of Stb. 2012/682 contains transitional law regarding this amendment.