Zoek op

Gecoördineerd Duits onderzoek naar internationale doorgifte persoonsgegevens

Gegevensoverdrachten van bedrijven naar landen buiten de Europese Unie of de Europese Economische Ruimte (derde landen) worden beoordeeld als onderdeel van een landelijk onderzoek door Duitse privacytoezichthouders. Het doel is om de vereisten van het Europese Hof van Justitie in zijn Schrems II-beslissing van 16 juli 2020 (Zaak C-311/18) in grote lijnen af ​​te dwingen.

European Data Protection Board 14 jul 2021



Nationwide assessment of companies' compliance about Schrems II decision of the European Court of Justice by numerous German data protection supervisory authorities

Companies’ data transfers to countries outside the European Union or the European Economic Area (third countries) are reviewed as part of a nationwide investigation. The goal is to broadly enforce the requirements of the European Court of Justice in its Schrems II decision of July 16, 2020 (Case C-311/18). There, the Court ruled that data transfers to the U.S. can no longer be made on the basis of the Privacy Shield adequacy decision. Furthermore, if the data exporter's assessment has shown that an essentially equivalent level of protection for the personal data cannot be ensured in the recipient state, the use of the standard data protection clauses for data transfers to third countries is only valid if additional effective measures are taken. In many cases, the ECJ's ruling requires a fundamental change in long-established business models and processes.

The German data protection authorities participating in the inspection have contacted companies individually with standardized questionnaires. Among other things, this will cover the use of third-party providers like e-mail-services, webhoster, services for web tracking or managing applicant data, and the intra-Group exchange of customer data and employee data within companies. Each supervisory authority decides individually in which of these subject areas it will take action.

The Court has made clear its expectation that authorities "suspend or prohibit" transfers which do not match the criteria of the Schrems-II-decision. Suspending a transfer can likely succeed in many cases through cooperative dialogue with companies. Where this is not possible, the available supervisory measures will be used to respond. The supervisory authorities are aware of the particular challenges that the ECJ ruling on Schrems II poses for companies in Germany and Europe. They are also available to answer questions of understanding in the further course of the examination procedure, insofar as this is possible in accordance with the available capacities.

The questionnaires for each case group can be accessed here in German language:

Artikel delen


Laat een reactie achter

U moet ingelogd zijn om een reactie te plaatsen.